26 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
(This is the third of three posts on Kenneth Miller and the problem of evil.)
I think the reason for Miller’s deep disdain of a relatively minor difference in our positions on evolution is not scientific. Rather, it’s theological. It’s called the problem of evil. Briefly stated, if God is responsible for designing not only [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
25 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
(This is the second of three posts on Kenneth Miller and the problem of evil.)
Let me emphasize the last point of my previous post: Miller and I are only quibbling over the extent of design in the universe. Thefact of design, the principle of design, we agree on.
Now, let’s look a little closer [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
24 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
(This is the first of three posts on Kenneth Miller and the problem of evil.)
Brown University biologist Kenneth R. Miller has penned a second review of The Edge of Evolution, this one for the Catholic magazine Commonweal (subscription required). In the new review Miller alludes to some scientific points from his first review inNature. [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
18 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
The current edition of The New Criterion carries a lengthy review of The Edge of Evolution (subscription required) by the biochemist Paul Gross. Unfortunately, although he is commendably civil and kindly praises my writing and speaking abilities, Gross offers little of actual substance other than to declare the book’s arguments wrong. He quotes Ken Miller [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
17 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
Science has published a letter by myself responding to Sean Carroll’s earlier review of The Edge of Evolution. In my letter I note that:
In his unfavorable review of my book, The Edge of Evolution, Sean Carroll writes that “Behe’s chief error is minimizing the power of natural selection to act cumulatively,” and implies [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
15 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
The Dutch biologist Gert Korthof maintains a website devoted to in-depth reviews of many books on evolution. Aside from often-insightful remarks, a delightful feature of his site is that he can write with great strength of feeling and yet not engage in insults or ad hominem remarks. He has posted an extensive review of The [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
12 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
Dear Readers,
This is the third in a series of responses I’m posting this week.
In “Evolution of the Bacterial Flagellum” (Microbe Magazine, July 2007), Wong et al seek to counter arguments of intelligent design proponents such as myself that the flagellum did not evolve by random mutation and natural selection. Unfortunately, their otherwise-fine review [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
11 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
Dear Readers,
This is the second in a series of responses I’m posting this week, this one regarding the Darwinian website The Panda’s Thumb,where a woman named Abbie Smith questioned whether results from HIV research actually square with the claims I made that little fundamental change has occurred in the virus, even though it attains enormous [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
9 October 2007
Michael J. Behe
Dear Readers,
As I wrote in The Edge of Evolution, Darwinism is a multifaceted theory, and to properly evaluate the theory one has to be very careful not to confuse its different aspects. Unfortunately, stories in the news and on the internet regularly confuse the facets of Darwinism, ignore distinctions made in The Edge of Evolution, [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off